Construction Economics and Peculiarities of Administration of Projects for Construction of Civil Protection Structures
Petrukha N. M., Petrukha S. V., Tiurmenko Y. M., Kononenko I. M.

Petrukha, Nina M. et al. (2024) “Construction Economics and Peculiarities of Administration of Projects for Construction of Civil Protection Structures.” The Problems of Economy 4:71–80.
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2024-4-71-80

Section: Economics and national economy management

UDC 728.64:645

Abstract:
Within the terms of the carried out study, it is found that the key aim of the system of administration of projects for construction of civil protection structures is to ensure a high level of coordination of the activities of all organizations involved in their development and implementation. This coordination should take into account the significant impact of such projects on strengthening national security and maintaining the economic stability of the State. It is found that modern approaches to the integration of various stakeholders, including government agencies, construction companies and design organizations, contribute to the creation of synergy in solving strategic objectives in this area. An analysis of the efficiency of the developed approach to project administration, which is based on the implementation of performance evaluation, quality control and agile management tools, is carried out. The role of the State system of technical regulation in the formation of a single regulatory framework that contributes to the harmonization of national construction standards with international requirements is also assessed. The expediency of using a multi-level system of criteria to evaluate the success of project implementation, which covers technical, economic, environmental and social aspects, is substantiated. A conceptual model of an efficient administration system has been developed, which combines the processes of strategic planning, resource management, monitoring of implementation and final evaluation of project results. It is proposed to introduce mechanisms for attracting funding from public, private and international sources, which ensures the sustainability and duration of project implementation. The proposed system of administration contributes to the maximum use of the economic and social potential of the construction of protection structures, ensuring compliance with national priorities of security and sustainable development. The results of the study create the basis for the formation of an innovative environment that contributes to increasing the competitiveness of the State, attracting investments and achieving long-term economic growth focused on strengthening the civil protection system.

Keywords: construction, civil protection structures, project administration, scoring model, construction norms and standards, economic efficiency.

Fig.: 3. Tabl.: 2. Bibl.: 22.

Petrukha Nina M. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of Construction Management, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture (31 Povitryanykh Syl Ave., Kyiv, 03680, Ukraine)
Email: nninna1983@gmail.com
Petrukha Serhii V. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of Construction Management, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture (31 Povitryanykh Syl Ave., Kyiv, 03680, Ukraine)
Email: psv03051984@gmail.com
Tiurmenko Yaroslav M. – Postgraduate Student, College of International Business (1 Duchnovic Square, Preshov, 08001, Slovakia)
Email: tyurmenko0212@gmail.com
Kononenko Ihor M. – Postgraduate Student, College of International Business (1 Duchnovic Square, Preshov, 08001, Slovakia)
Email: k2i2m2@ukr.net

List of references in article

Bohdanets, B. Budivnytstvo obiektiv fondu zakhysnykh sporud tsyvilnoho zakhystu yak pravovyi element bezpeky pidpryiemnytskoi diialnosti [Construction of Civil Defense Facilities as a Legal Element of Business Security]. 2023. DOI: 10.36059/978-966-397-351-7-30
Nuzhnyi, V. P. “Pershi doslidzhennia ushkodzhennia budivel i sporud vnaslidok boiovykh dii“ [First Studies of Damage to Buildings and Structures Due to Hostilities]. Budivelni konstruktsii. Teoriia i praktyka, no. 11 (2022): 104-114.
Akselrod, R. B. et al. “Innovatsiini napriamy onovlennia operatsiinykh system budivelnykh pidpryiemstv v umovakh nestabilnoho biznes-seredovyshcha proiektu“ [Innovative Directions for Updating Operating Systems of Construction Enterprises in an Unstable Business Environment of the Project]. Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system, no. 48 (2021): 102-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2412-9933.2021.48.102-113
Tymoshenko, M. O., and Konyk, S. V. “Zakhystytysia vid viiny: yak vdoskonalyty fond ukryttiv v Ukraini“ [Protecting Yourself From War: how to Improve the Shelter Fund in Ukraine]. Ukrainska pravda. 2022. https://www.epravda.com.ua/columns/2022/06/15/688187
Shpakov, A. V. et al. “Innovatsiino-prykladna osnova strukturno-funktsionalnoi rehlamentatsii operatsiinoi systemy upravlinnia providnykh steikkholderiv budivelnoho proiektu“ [Innovative and Applied Basis for Structural and Functional Regulation of the Operational Management System of Leading Stakeholders of a Construction Project]. Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system, no. 47 (2021): 151-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2412-9933.2021.47.151-161
Buravchenko, S. “Adaptyvni arkhitekturno-budivelni systemy optymizovani za stsenariiamy zmin“ [Adaptive Architectural and Building Systems Optimized for Change Scenarios]. Suchasni problemy arkhitektury ta mistobuduvannia, no. 65 (2023): 6-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2077-3455.2023.65.6-27
Hetun, H. et al. “Osoblyvosti obiemno-planuvalnykh rishen zakhysnykh sporud tsyvilnoho zakhystu“ [Features of Spatial Planning Solutions for Civil Defense Protective Structures]. Suchasni problemy arkhitektury ta mistobuduvannia, no. 67 (2023): 203-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2077-3455.2023.67.203-220
Ryzhakov, D. A. et al. “Informatsiino-analitychni novatsii ta biznes-modeli upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom v suchasnii systemi budivelnoho developmentu“ [Information and Analytical Innovations and Business Models of Enterprise Management in the Modern Construction Development System]. Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system, no. 52 (2022): 103-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2412-9933.2022.52.103-112
Ryzhakova, G., Petrukha, S., and Kunytskyi, K. “Institutional foundations and regulatory levers for the development of agricultural construction under conditions of systemic economic transformation“. Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system, no. 40 (2019): 147-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11969082
Hryhorenko, V. V. et al. “Prykladni pidsystemy analitychnoho suprovodu instytutsiinykh uchasnykiv pry realizatsii proiektiv DPP u budivnytstvi“ [Applied Subsystems of Analytical Support for Institutional Participants in the Implementation of PPP Projects in Construction]. Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system, no. 45 (2021): 141-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2412-9933.2020.45.141-149
Makedon, V. V., Valikov, V. P., and Fedora, S. S. “Udoskonalennia upravlinnia promyslovymy pidpryiemstvamy na osnovi stratehii innovatsiinoho rozvytku“ [Improving the Management of Industrial Enterprises Based on Innovative Development Strategies]. Yevropeiskyi vektor ekonomichnoho rozvytku, no. 1 (2019): 108-125. DOI: 10.32342/2074-5362-2019-1-26-8
Vadimov, V. M., and Pydko, M. O. “Problemy tsyvilnoho zakhystu zhytlovoi zabudovy v mistakh Ukrainy v konteksti staloho rozvytku“ [Problems of Civil Protection of Residential Buildings in Ukrainian Cities in the Context of Sustainable Development]. Suchasni problemy arkhitektury ta mistobuduvannia, no. 69 (2024): 140-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2077-3455.2024.69.140-156
Makhniuk, V. V., Makhniuk, V. M., and Samoilova, I. I. “Zabezpechennia vymoh tsyvilnoho zakhystu naselennia Ukrainy v umovakh viiny pid chas planuvannia ta zabudovy terytorii“ [Ensuring the Requirements of Civil Protection of the Population of Ukraine in Wartime During Planning and Development of Territories]. Vcheni zapysky TNU imeni V.I. Vernadskoho. Seriia : Publichne upravlinnia ta administruvannia, vol. 34 (73), no. 1 (2023): 63-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/TNU-2663-6468/2023.1/12
Makedon, V. V., and Valikov, V. P. “Ekonomichna bezpeka pidpryiemstva v kontsepti protsesnoho upravlinnia“ [Economic Security of the Enterprise in the Concept of Process Management]. Nobelivskyi visnyk, no. 1(10) (2017): 12-22. DOI: 10.32342/2616-3853-2017-1-10-2
Bind, V. Ye. et al. “Formalizatsiia ta zahalnometodychnyi kontsept vartisnoho inzhynirynhu v systemi antykryzovoho menedzhmentu budivelnykh pidpryiemstv“ [Formalization and General Methodological Concept of Value Engineering in the System of Anti-crisis Management of Construction Enterprises]. Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system, no. 44 (2020): 116-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2412-9933.2020.44.116-127
Avanesova, N. et al. “Strategic management in the system model of the corporate enterprise organizational development“. Economics and Finance, vol. 9, no. 1/2021 (2021): 18-30.
Khomenko, O. M. et al. “Suchasni instrumenty ta prohramni produkty administruvannia budivelnymy orhanizatsiiamy v umovakh transformatsii operatsiinykh system menedzhmentu“ [Modern Tools and Software Products for Administration by Construction Organizations in the Context of Transformation of Operational Management Systems]. Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system, no. 52 (2022): 113-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2412-9933.2022.52.113-125
Petrenko, H. S. et al. “Vybir imperatyviv biudzhetuvannia investytsiino-budivelnoho proiektu yak napriam udoskonalennia systemy finansovoho menedzhmentu pidpryiemstva“ [The Choice of Budgeting Imperatives for an Investment and Construction Project as a Direction for Improving the Financial Management System of an Enterprise]. Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system, no. 46 (2021): 108-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2412-9933.2021.46.108-117
“Zakhysni sporudy tsyvilnoho zakhystu DBN V.2.2-5:2023“ [Civil Defense Protective Structures DBN V.2.2-5:2023]. Departament tekhnichnoho rehuliuvannia u budivnytstvi Ministerstva rozvytku hromad, terytorii ta infrastruktury Ukrainy. https://dreamdim.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/DBN_V_2_2_5-2023.pdf
Timokhin, V. O., Harbar, M. V., and Shchurova, V. A. “Kontseptualnist i ratsionalnist v orhanizatsii pidzemnykh prostoriv transportno-peresadochnykh vuzliv“ [Conceptuality and Rationality in the Organization of Underground Spaces of Transport Interchanges]. Suchasni problemy arkhitektury ta mistobuduvannia, no. 67 (2023): 382-393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32347/2077-3455.2023.67.382-393
Klymenko, K., Petrukha, N., and Petrukha, S. ““Green” Marshall Plan For Ukraine: Financial, Economic and Regulatory Context“. RFI Scientific Papers, no. 1(106) (2024): 20-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33763/npndfi2024.01.020
Petrukha, N. M., and Petrukha, S. V. Derzhavne rehuliuvannia intehrovanykh korporatyvnykh obiednan v umovakh strukturno-instytutsionalnoi ta funktsionalnoi transformatsii silskoi ekonomiky: problemy metodolohii, teorii, sotsialno-ekonomichnoi ta sektoralnoi polityky [State Regulation of Integrated Corporate Associations in the Context of Structural, Institutional and Functional Transformation of the Rural Economy: Problems of Methodology, Theory, Socio-economic and Sectoral Policy]. Kyiv: TOV «Vydavnychyi dim «Profesional», 2020.