Business Ideology as a Reflection Reaction to Socioeconomic Realities in Conditions of Constructive Destabilization
Prokhorova V. V., Protsenko V. M., Bozhanova O. V., Protsenko A. V.

Prokhorova, Viktoriia V. et al. (2022) “Business Ideology as a Reflection Reaction to Socioeconomic Realities in Conditions of Constructive Destabilization.” The Problems of Economy 4:177–185.
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2022-4-177-185

Section: Economics and Enterprise Management

UDC 336

Abstract:
The aim of the study is to generalize the theoretical and applied aspects of the formation of an ideological space of a unified nature as a reflexive reaction of business to socioeconomic realities in conditions of constructive destabilization. Based on the carried out analysis of statistical data, it is proved that a fundamentally new direction comes into being for domestic economic science, i. e., studies of business behavior for the faster recovery of the country’s economy, which requires the formalization of adequate instruments of a modern manager. Analyzing, systematizing and generalizing the scientific works of many scholars, the views of researchers on the definition of the concept of «ideology» were systematized, the principles of business ideology were allocated, the goal, types, signs, functions, principles, methods of ideological influence within the framework of building the ideology of management were defined. The presented publication forms theoretical and applied aspects of the ideological space of a unified nature as a reflexive reaction of business to socioeconomic realities. The issue of reflection as a system of reactions to socioeconomic realities is examined. The article considers the forms of reflection, the objective etiology of the formation of spheres of reflection through the prism of multidisciplinary connections. It is proved that the forms of reflection as a system of business reaction to socioeconomic realities in conditions of constructive destabilization have a tactical and strategic result. For a clear understanding and detailed analysis of the behavior of the problem under study, a block diagram of causal relationships is built. It is proved that reflection is an instrument for influencing the development of emotional intelligence, which explains the nature of the analytical choice of an alternative solution to the subject of economic relations and determines the possibilities of consolidated external information influence on this choice. Of practical importance is the universal model of the cognitive map of the behavioral model of business structures, which allows to explain the multi-vector format of development in rational, limited rational and irrational dimensions, combining the features of the model of constructive development of the destabilizing format and crisis phenomena.

Keywords: reflection, ideology of business, ideological influence, ideology, constructive destabilization.

Fig.: 3. Tabl.: 1. Bibl.: 17.

Prokhorova Viktoriia V. – Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, Head of the Department, Department of Economics and Management, Educational and Scientific Institute "Ukrainian Engineering and Pedagogical Academy" of V. N. Karazin Kharkov National University (16 Unіversytetska Str., Kharkіv, 61003, Ukraine)
Email: vkprohkorova@gmail.com
Protsenko Valentyna M. – Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Pro-rector, Odesa National Medical University (2 Valikhovskyi Ln., Odesa, 65000, Ukraine)
Email: protsenko_dinz@ukr.net
Bozhanova Olena V. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Dean, Faculty of Economics and Management, Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies (2 Akademika Lazariana Str., Dnipro, 49010, Ukraine)
Email: bozhanovaelena68@gmail.com
Protsenko Anastasiia V. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Department of Economics and Management, Ukrainian Engineering and Pedagogical Academy (16 Unіversytetska Str., Kharkіv, 61003, Ukraine)
Email: pr0160@ukr.net

List of references in article

Karlof, B. Delovaya strategiya [Business Strategy]. Moscow: Ekonomika, 1991.
Tompson, A. A., and Striklend, A. Dzh. Strategicheskiy menedzhment. Iskusstvo razrabotki i realizatsii strategii [Strategic Management. The Art of Developing and Executing a Strategy]. Moscow: Banki i birzhi; YuNITI, 1998.
Manngeym, K. Ideologiya i utopiya [Ideology and Utopia]. Moscow: Yurist, 1994.
Fromm, E. Vtecha vid svobody [Escape from Freedom]. Kharkiv: KSD, 2019.
Minar, D. “Ideology and Political Behavior“. Midwest Journal of Political Science, no. 4 (1961): 317-331.
Mullins, W. “The Concept of Ideology: An Analysis and Evaluation“. http://www.academia.edu/8972995/Management_and_Organisational_Behaviour_L_Mullins_Pitman_
Mendra, A. Osnovy sotsiologii [Fundamentals of Sociology]. Moscow: Nota Bene, 1998.
Zolotarova, O. V., and Klementieva, O. Yu. “Zarubizhnyi dosvid formuvannia korporatyvnoi kultury ta mozhlyvosti yoho adaptatsii vitchyznianym biznesom“ [Foreign Experience in the Formation of Corporate Culture and the Possibility of its Adaptation by Domestic Business]. Efektyvna ekonomika. 2017. http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=5969
Isaieva, O. “Kontseptualnyi pidkhid do rivniv formuvannia ekonomichnoi destabilizatsii ta klasyfikatsii yii chynnykiv“ [Conceptual Approach to the Levels of Formation of Economic Destabilization and Classification of Its Factors]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu, no. 1(15) (2009): 57-66.
Anisimova, S. A. “Nelineynyye modeli teorii refleksivnogo upravleniya“ [Nonlinear Models of the Theory of Reflexive Control]. Izvestiya vuzov. Prikladnaya nelineynaya dinamika, vol. 12, no. 12 (2004): 96-113.
Lefevr, V. A. Refleksiya [Reflection]. Kyiv: Kogito-Tsentr, 2003.
Lepskyi, V. Ye. “Stanovlennia stratehichnykh subiektiv: postanovka problemy refleksii“ [Formation of Strategic Subjects: Posing the Problem of Reflection]. Protsesy refleksii i upravlinnia, no. 1 (2002): 5-23.
Horal, L. T. “Bahatoaspektnist formuvannia protsesu upravlinnia bezpekoiu rozvytku promyslovoho pidpryiemstva“ [Multifaceted Nature of Forming the Process of Management of Industrial Enterprise Development Security]. Problemy ekonomiky, no. 2 (2020): 240-246.
Prokhorova, V., Bozhanova, O., and Dudnieva, Yu. “Konverhentno-kohnityvni osnovy innovatsiinoho rozvytku promyslovykh pidpryiemstv“ [Convergent and Cognitive Bases of Innovative Development of Industrial Enterprises]. Adaptyvne upravlinnia: teoriia i praktyka. Seriia Ekonomika, no. 10(20) (2021). DOI: 10.33296/2707-0654-10(20)-07
Prokhorova, V. et al. “Methodological aspects of assessing the sustainable development of energy companies“. IOP Conference. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021. Ivano-Frankivsk, 2020. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/628/1/012011
Prokhorova, V. V., Zalutska, Kh. Ya., and Us, Yu. V. “Formation of motivational mechanism in strategic management of a diversified enterprise“. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, no. 1 (2021): 177-185.
Pylypenko, Yu. et al. “Transition to a new paradigm of human capital development in the dynamic environment of the knowledge economy“. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, no. 6 (2021): 170-176.