The Subject and Object of the Transformation Process in Rural Areas
Pyvovar P. V., Kostyuk L. P.

Pyvovar, Petro V., and Kostyuk, Lyudmyla P. (2021) “The Subject and Object of the Transformation Process in Rural Areas.” The Problems of Economy 3:91–99.
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2021-3-91-99

Section: Regional economy

UDC 316.344.55

Abstract:
One of the fundamental tasks for Ukraine’s development is to ensure stable socio-economic development of both the country as a whole and its smallest territorial and administrative units. In turn, changes, which very often take place as transformation processes, are an integral element (prerequisite) for the development of any process or phenomenon. The article is aimed at identifying a system of subjects and objects of the transformation process in rural areas. To our opinion, the subjects of transformation in rural areas includes both producers and consumers of socially necessary goods, as well as those who ensure the functioning of economic entities in rural areas to achieve public welfare. The subject of rural areas transformation is the carrier of substantive and practical work, the source of socio-economic activity aimed at the transformation object. Both an individual resident of rural areas, and various socio-economic groups can take on the role of the subject of rural transformation. We have identified two groups of transformation subjects in rural areas: individuals (rural population, households, community, entrepreneurs) and legal entities (enterprises, rural authorities, NGOs). The main transformation objects in rural areas include the following: human potential, natural resource potential, financial potential, intellectual potential, information potential, and infrastructure. In the process of scientific understanding of any socio-economic phenomenon or process additi not only the subject and object are to be considered, but also the aspects which are part of the object. We have identified the following main aspects of transformation in rural areas: the relationship of society and nature, land (market) relations, market environment, R&D system, management system, financial relations, social relations.

Keywords: rural areas, transformation, subject, object, aspect.

Fig.: 3. Bibl.: 27.

Pyvovar Petro V. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of International Economic Relations and European Integration, Polissia National University (7 Staryi Blvd, Zhytomyr, 10008, Ukraine)
Email: petro.pyvovar@polissiauniver.edu.ua
Kostyuk Lyudmyla P. – Postgraduate Student, Polissia National University (7 Staryi Blvd, Zhytomyr, 10008, Ukraine)
Email: znau_dilovod@i.ua

List of references in article

Cooper, R. “What is Civil Society, its role and value in 2018? : K4D Helpdesk Report“. Brighton, UK : Institute of Development Studies, 2018. https://bit.ly/3iZ0je6
Chitea, L. F., and Dona, I. “Defining aspects concerning the rural household and the sustainable socio-economic development in Romania“. Agrarian Economy and Rural Development - Realities and Perspectives for Romania, vol. 8 (2017): 92-99.
McConnell, C. R., Brue, S. L., and Flynn, S. M. Economics: Principles, problems, and policies. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2005.
Moldavan, L. V. “Hlobalizatsiina transformatsiia zemlekorystuvannia: naslidky ta sposoby yikh zapobihannia“ [Globalization of Land Use Transformation: Consequences and Ways to Prevent Them]. Ekonomika APK, no. 6 (2020): 6-18.
“Rural households and their pathways out of poverty“. World Bank. https://bit.ly/3gi08cc
[Legal Act of Ukraine] (2021). https://bit.ly/3y4Eu0W
[Legal Act of Ukraine] (2003). https://bit.ly/3z8CgPC
“Metodolohichni poiasnennia. Naselennia miske i silske“ [Methodological Explanations. Urban and Rural Population]. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy. 2018. http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2007/ds/nas_rik/nas_u/nas_met.html
“Naiavnist u domohospodarstvakh tovariv tryvaloho korystuvannia (za danymy vybirkovoho opytuvannia domohospodarstv u zhovtni 2020 roku) : stat. zb.“ [Availability of Durable Goods in Households (According to a Sample Survey of Households in October 2020): Statistical Collection]. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy. 2021. https://bit.ly/3svxVUd
[Legal Act of Ukraine] (2008). https://bit.ly/3y7gLxg
Kotkovskyi, V. R. “Instytut mistsevoho samovriaduvannia: problemy stanovlennia ta rozvytku“ [ENGLISH_UA Institute of Local Self-Government: Problems of Formation and Development]. Derzhavne budivnytstvo. 2016. https://bit.ly/2WbLXhL
Kryvobok, P. V. “Sotsialno-oriientovane pidpryiemstvo yak model sotsialno-ekonomichnoho rozvytku sil Ukrainy“ [Socially-oriented Enterprise as a Model of Socio-economic Development of Villages in Ukraine]. Ahrosvit, no. 14 (2015): 51-56.
Krushelnytska, T. A. “Instytutsiini osnovy ekonomichnoi bezpeky Ukrainy v teorii natsionalnoi fiskalnoi konverhentsii“ [Institutional Bases of Economic Security of Ukraine in the Theory of National Fiscal Convergence]. Visnyk Akademii mytnoi sluzhby Ukrainy. Ser. Derzhavne upravlinnia, no. 2 (2014): 7-11.
Lazor, O. D. Osnovy mistsevoho samovriaduvannia [Fundamentals of Local Self-government]. Kyiv: Tsentr navch. lit., 2003.
Lukianova, M. M. “Rol orhanizatsii hromadianskoho suspilstva v rozvytku silskykh terytorii“ [The Role of Civil Society Organizations in the Development of Rural Areas]. Ahrosvit, no. 11 (2020): 127-135.
Pylypenko, V. V. “Kontseptualni zasady formuvannia derzhavnoi ahrarnoi polityky v konteksti reformuvannia ahrarnoho sektoru ekonomiky“ [Conceptual Bases of Formation of the State Agrarian Policy in the Context of Reforming of Agrarian Sector of Economy]. Hlobalni ta natsionalni problemy ekonomiky, no. 11 (2016): 186-190.
Polyakova, N. N. “Evolyutsiya mestnogo samoupravleniya v Velikobritanii“ [The Evolution of Local Government in the UK]. Pravo i upravleniye. XXI vek, no. 2 (2011): 19-.
[Legal Act of Ukraine] (2008). https://bit.ly/2WaXkqj
“Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy“ [Dictionary of the Ukrainian Language], vol. 3. https://bit.ly/3jQf6Hj
Riabokon, V. P., and Rarok, L. A. “Rozvytok sotsialnoi infrastruktury silskykh terytorii“ [ENGLISH_UA Development of Social Infrastructure of Rural Areas]. Ekonomika APK, no. 4 (2016): 56-65.
Tokvil, A. O demokratii v Amerike [Democracy in America]. Moscow: Knizhnoye delo, 1897.
[Legal Act of Ukraine] (2010). http://ukrstat.gov.ua/klasf/nac_kls/op_dk009_2016.htm
Khill, D. M. Teoriya demokratii i mestnoye samoupravleniye [Democracy Theory and Local Government]. London, 1974.
Khollis, G., and Plokker, K. Na puti k demokraticheskoy detsentralizatsii: perestroyka regionalnykh i mestnykh organov vlasti v novoy Yevrope [Towards Democratic Decentralization: Restructuring Regional and Local Governments in a New Europe]. Moscow: Yevropeyskaya ekspertnaya sluzhba po programme «Tasis», 1995.
Shanin, O. V. “Kontseptsiia seloutvoriuiuchoho pidpryiemstva v systemi rozvytku silskykh terytorii“ [The Concept of a Village-forming Enterprise in the System of Rural Development]. Efektyvna ekonomika, no. 4 (2015): 213-215.
Shynkaruk, V. I. et al. Filosofskyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk [Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Kyiv, 2002.
Yavorska, T. Malyi biznes u silskomu hospodarstvi: teoriia i praktyka [Small Business in Agriculture: Theory and Practice]. Kyiv: NNTs IAE, 2012.