Theoretical and Methodological Approach to Identify Promising Areas in Scientific and Scientific and Technological Activity in Ukraine
Kyzym M. O., Khaustova V. Y., Reshetnyak O. I., Uspalenko V. I.

Kyzym, Mykola O. et al. (2021) “Theoretical and Methodological Approach to Identify Promising Areas in Scientific and Scientific and Technological Activity in Ukraine.” The Problems of Economy 2:23–36.
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2021-2-23-36

Section: Economics and national economy management

UDC 001.89

Abstract:
The study is aimed at developing and implementing a theoretical and methodological approach to identify promising areas in scientific and scientific and technological activity in Ukraine. The following general and special methods are used: logical analysis (to determine the state and trends in the development of scientific and scientific and technological activity in Ukraine and other countries); modeling and prognosticating (to create prognostic models of scientific support for economic development); analysis and synthesis (to determine the priority areas of scientific and scientific and technological activity, general-purpose technologies and areas of scholars training); fuzzy logics (to identify sectors of economy, promising for scientific and scientific and technological development, and priority areas in scientific and scientific and technological activity. The suggested theoretical and methodical approach to substantiate promising guidelines for scientific and scientific and technological activity in Ukraine requires the following: analysis of current trends and assessment of global guidelines for scientific and scientific and technological activity; identification of promising economic sectors of Ukraine as for ensuring scientific and scientific and technological activity, and assessment of scientific support for their development; substantiation of the choice of promising general-purpose technologies and areas of scientific and scientific and technological activity in the country; substantiation of training areas for scientific personnel; identification of priority areas in providing scientific and scientific and technological activity that enables taking into account both global economic development trends and features, and the state of scientific and scientific and technological activity in the country. The use of the suggested theoretical and methodical approach has made it possible to substantiate the main topics of the activity in question and promising general-purpose technologies, which are aimed at ensuring the development of traditional economic sectors of strategic importance and high-tech industries, the development of which will increase the country's competitiveness and living standards in the future, i.e. meet the needs of all the stakeholders of scientific and scientific and technological activity (government, education, business, society).

Keywords: general-purpose technologies, priority directions of scientific and scientific and technological activity, reasonable specialization, scientific support for developing economic areas, stakeholders of scientific and scientific and technological activity.

Fig.: 3. Tabl.: 4. Formulae: 9. Bibl.: 22.

Kyzym Mykola O. – Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, Corresponding Member of NAS of Ukraine, Chief research scientist, Research Centre for Industrial Problems of Development of NAS of Ukraine (2 floor 1-a Inzhenernyi Ln., Kharkіv, 61166, Ukraine)
Email: m.kyzym@gmail.com
Khaustova Viktoriia Ye. – Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, Director, Research Centre for Industrial Problems of Development of NAS of Ukraine (2 floor 1-a Inzhenernyi Ln., Kharkіv, 61166, Ukraine)
Email: v.khaust@gmail.com
Reshetnyak Olena I. – Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Head of, Sector of Industrial Policy and Innovative Development, Research Centre for Industrial Problems of Development of NAS of Ukraine (2 floor 1-a Inzhenernyi Ln., Kharkіv, 61166, Ukraine)
Email: reshetele@ukr.net
Uspalenko Vitalij I. – Candidate of Sciences (Engineering), Professor, Head of the Department, Department of Finance and Credit, Kharkiv National University of Civil Engineering and Architecture (40 Sumska Str., Kharkіv, 61002, Ukraine)

List of references in article

Khaustova, V. Ye., and Reshetniak, O. I. “Doslidzhennia stanu ta tendentsii rozvytku nauky v krainakh svitu ta Ukraini“ [Research on the State of Science and Trends in its Development in Countries of the World and Ukraine]. Problemy ekonomiky, no. 3 (2019): 11-22. DOI: 10.32983/2222-0712-2019-3-11-22
Kyzym, M. O., Khaustova, V. Ye., and Reshetniak, O. I. “Problemy vyboru priorytetnykh napriamiv rozvytku nauky ta tekhniky v Ukraini“ [Problems of Selecting the Priority Directions of the Science and Technology Development in Ukraine]. Biznes Inform, no. 7 (2020): 50-58. DOI: 10.32983/2222-4459-2020-7-50-58
Amosha, O. et al. “Instytutsiini determinanty vprovadzhennia kontseptsii smart-spetsializatsii: pryklad staropromyslovykh rehioniv Ukrainy“ [Institutional Determinants of Smart Specialization Concept Implementation: An Example of old Industrial Regions of Ukraine]. Zhurnal yevropeiskoi ekonomiky, vol. 17, no. 3(66) (2018): 310-344.
Heiets, V. “Instytuty u rozshyrenni tekhnolohichnoi modernizatsii ekonomiky Ukrainy“ [Institutes in the Expansion of Technological Modernization of the Economy of Ukraine]. Zhurnal yevropeiskoi ekonomiky, vol. 15, no. 3 (2016): 255-265.
Yehorov, I. Yu. “Formuvannia derzhavnoi naukovo-tekhnichnoi ta innovatsiinoi polityky na osnovi rozshyrenoi modeli «potriinoi spirali» (derzhava - nauka - promyslovist) (korotka informatsiia pro proiekt)“ [Formation of the State Scientific-technical and Innovation Policy on the Basis of the Expanded Model of "Triple Spiral" (The State - Science - the Industry) (The Short Information on the Project)]. Nauka ta innovatsii. 2018. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/scinn_2018_14_1_9
Kyzym, M., Reshetniak, O., and Lelyuk, O. “Simulating Development of Science in a Country with the Use of the Cognitive Approach“. International Transport Infrastructure, Industrial Centers and Corporate Logistics, vol. 67, 2019. DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20196701008
Lozovyi, V. S. “Reformuvannia naukovoi sfery yak chynnyk perevedennia ekonomiky Ukrainy na innovatsiinu model rozvytku“ [Reforming the Scientific Sphere as a Factor in the Transition of Ukraine's Economy to an Innovative Model of Development]. Politolohichni studii. 2016. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/znpps_2016_5_17
Mori, I. “Research futures Drivers and scenarios for the next decade Summary report“. Elsevier, 2019. https://www.elsevier.com__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/847960/Research-Futures_Summary.pdf
Savina, N. B., and Yavorska, M. K. “Shliakhy zabezpechennia rozvytku nauky vyshchoi shkoly yak pidsystemy natsionalnoi innovatsiinoi systemy“ [Ways to Ensure the Development of Higher Education Science as a Subsystem of the National Innovation System]. Visnyk Volynskoho instytutu ekonomiky ta menedzhmentu, no. 22 (2018): 229-236.
Reshetniak, O. I. “Analiz vplyvu NNTD na riven ekonomichnoho ta sotsialnoho rozvytku“ [Analysis of the Impact of NNTD on the Level of Economic and Social Development]. Prychornomorski ekonomichni studii, vol. 1, no. 55 (2020): 34-39. DOI: 10.32843/bses.55-5
Reshetniak, O. I. Naukova ta naukovo-tekhnichna diialnist v Ukraini: otsinka ta napriamky rozvytku [Scientific and Scientific-technical Activity in Ukraine: Assessment and Directions of Development]. Kharkiv: FOP Liburkina L. M., 2020.
Khaustova, V. Ye., and Reshetniak, O. I. “Osnovni tendentsii ta problemy rozvytku nauky v Ukraini“ [Main Trends and Problems in the Development of Science in Ukraine]. Problemy ekonomiky, no. 2 (2019): 62-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2019-2-62-72
Radosevic, S. et al. Advances in the Theory and Practice of Smart Specialization. Academic Press, 2017.
Foray, D. “From Smart Specialisation to Smart Specialisation Policy“. European Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 17, no. 4 (2014): 492-507.
Reshetniak, O. I. “Forsait-metody v upravlinni naukovo-tekhnolohichnym rozvytkom“ [Forsyth Methods in the Management of Scientific and Technological Development]. Efektyvna ekonomika, no. 12 (2019). DOI: 10.32702/2307-2105-2019.12.67
“Guide to OECD's Trade in Value Added (TiVA) Indicators“. OECD, 2019. https://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/tiva/TiVA2018_Indicators_Guide.pdf
Zadeh, L. A. “Fuzzy sets“. Information and Control, vol. 8, no. 3 (1965): 338-353.
SCImago Journal & Country Rank. https://www.scimagojr.com/countryrank.php?year=2018
World Intellectual Property Organization WIPO. https://www3.wipo.int/ipstats/index.htm?tab=patent
“Spetsializovana BD «Vynakhody (korysni modeli) v Ukraini»“ [Specialized Database "Inventions (Utility Models) in Ukraine"]. Ukrainskyi instytut intelektualnoi vlasnosti. https://base.uipv.org/searchBUL/search.php?dbname=certtm
“Nauka“ [Science]. Ministerstvo nauky i osvity Ukrainy. https://mon.gov.ua/ua/tag/nauka
Natsionalna akademiia nauk Ukrainy. http://www.nas.gov.ua/UA/Pages/default.aspx