Decarbonization of the Steel Industry: the Role of State Economic Policy
Glushchenko A. M.

Glushchenko, Andrii M. (2020) “Decarbonization of the Steel Industry: the Role of State Economic Policy.” The Problems of Economy 1:340–347.
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2020-1-340-347

Section: Economics of Natural Resources and Environment

UDC 338.2

Abstract:
The aim of the article is to analyze the potential areas of decarbonization of steel production in order to propose government policy measures for reducing CO2 emissions. The study examines the structure of global carbon dioxide emissions, the trends in CO2 emissions from the steel industry, and the environmental policies of the EU and China. Moreover, economic and technological factors complicating the decarbonization of the steel industry are characterized. The main sources of carbon dioxide emissions at steel-producing enterprises are considered. Using the example of a European company, the volume of capital investment for decarbonization of steel production is shown. The key groups of measures that can help solve the problem of CO2 emissions (carbon capture and storage, carbon capture and utilization, prevention of emissions) are identified. The possibilities and limitations for the application of specific decarbonization measures including melting steel in electric arc furnaces, replacing coke with charcoal, using hydrogen in a blast furnace and for direct reduction of iron, and employing electrolysis of iron are analyzed. The carbon intensity of various decarbonization technologies as well as the potential terms for their commercial implementation are compared. As a result of the study, instruments of economic policy for accelerating the decarbonization of the steel industry are identified. The advantages and disadvantages of these instruments are analyzed. The conclusion about the impossibility of decarbonization without state participation, due to the fact that enterprises in the free market do not receive sufficient competitive advantages from investments to considerably reduce CO2 emissions, is made. The prospects for further research are associated with an in-depth study of the instruments of state policy for decarbonization as well as development of directions for decarbonization of other sectors of the economy.

Keywords: decarbonization, carbon capture and utilization, direct reduction of iron ore, instruments of state financing.

Fig.: 4. Tabl.: 1. Bibl.: 19.

Glushchenko Andrii M. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), GMK Center, LLC (office 10a, 42-44 Shovkovychna Str., Kyiv, 01004, Ukraine)
Email: statproff@gmail.com

List of references in article

Leal-Arcas, R., Filis, A., and Nalule, V. “Energy decentralization and decarbonization: The case of Romania and Malta“. Natural Resources Journal. 2020. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3460016
Leal-Arcas, R. et al. “Decarbonizing the Energy Sector“. Journal of Animal & Natural Resource Law, vol. 15 (2019): 173-272.
Li, L., and Taeihagh, A. “An in-depth analysis of the evolution of the policy mix for the sustainable energy transition in China from 1981 to 2020“. Applied Energy, vol. 263 (2020): 1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114611
Melnikova, S. I. “Dekarbonizatsiya yevropeyskoy energetiki: tseli i realii“ [Decarbonization of European Energy: Goals and Realities]. Sovremennaya nauka: issledovaniya, idei, rezultaty, tekhnologii, no. 2 (2013): 168-172.
Duff, R., and Lenox, M. “Path to 2060: Decarbonizing the Industrial Sector“. Batten Report. 2018. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329810198_Path_to_2060_Decarbonizing_the_Industrial_Sector
Hermwille, L. “Exploring the Prospects for a Sectoral Decarbonization Club in the Steel Industry“. COP21 RIPPLES - COP21: Results and Implications for Pathways and Policies for Low Emissions European Societies. 2019. https://www.cop21ripples.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/20190829_COP21-RIPPLES_D4-3d_Steel-Sector-Decarbonization-Club.pdf
Newbery, D. “Policies for decarbonizing a liberalized power sector“. Economics E-Journal (2018): 1-28. DOI: 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2018-40
Meckling, J., Sterner, T., and Wagner, G. “Policy sequencing toward decarbonization“. Nature Energy, no. 2 (2017): 918-922. DOI: 10.1038/s41560-017-0025-8
Landis, F. et al. “Multi-model comparison of Swiss decarbonization scenarios“. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, vol. 155, no. 12 (2019): 1-18. DOI: 10.1186/s41937-019-0040-8
Daniele, S. et al. “Cost-benefit analysis to support decarbonization scenario for 2030: A case study in Italy“. Energy Policy, vol. 137 (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111137
Jackson, R. B. et al. “Global energy growth is outpacing decarbonization“. Envrionmental Research Letters, vol. 13, no. 12 (2018). DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaf303
“Tracking Industry“. IEA. Paris, 2019. https://www.iea.org/reports/tracking-industry
“Steel Statistical Yearbook 2018“. World Steel association. https://www.worldsteel.org/en/dam/jcr:e5a8eda5-4b46-4892-856b-00908b5ab492/SSY_2018.pdf
De Pee, A. et al. Decarbonization of industrial sectors: the next frontier. Amsterdam: Mc Kinsey, 2018.
“Industrial Transformation 2050. Pathways to net-zero emissions from EU heavy industry“. Material economics. 2019. https://materialeconomics.com/publications/industrial-transformation-2050
The European Steel. The wind of change. Luxembourg, 2018. DOI: 10.2777/236603
Low carbon roadmap. Pathways to a CO2-neutral European steel industry. Brussels: Eurofer, 2019.
“Tracking industrial energy efficiency and CO2 emissions“. IEA. Paris, 2007. https://webstore.iea.org/tracking-industrial-energy-efficiency-and-co2-emissions
“ArcelorMittal Climate Action Report 1“. May 2019. https://corporate.arcelormittal.com/~/media/Files/A/ArcelorMittal/investors/corporate/AM_ClimateActionReport_1.pdf