УКР
ENG
Search


Worldview, Social Consolidation, Science: Dialectic Relationship
Kyzym M. O., Doronina M. S.

Kyzym, Mykola O., and Doronina, Maya S. (2019) “Worldview, Social Consolidation, Science: Dialectic Relationship.” The Problems of Economy 4:156–162.
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2019-4-156-162

Section: Economic theory

Article is written in English
Downloads/views: 94

Download article in pdf format -

UDC 101.8

Abstract:
In Ukraine, the problem of social consolidation, the current state of which does not allow for a meaningful forecasting of its future, is getting more urgent. Many publications propose recommendations for solving this problem through a permanent diagnosing of mechanisms for the formation and development of worldview resources. The world around a person is continuously and abruptly changing and requires developing scientifically based mechanisms for conscious adapting of a person to it. The aim of the article is generalizing the prerequisites for the creation of theoretical and methodological support for harmonizing the development of a worldview, social consolidation and science in Ukraine. Worldview creates for a person a general view of the outside world he/she is guided by when making important decisions and committing acts of social significance. Studying worldview allows determining what social patterns should be built in Ukraine, how to organize the constructive discussion of the way of solving the current problems by people with different worldviews; will help adapt the system of dialectical principles that are traditionally used by scientists in Ukraine to studying worldview. The article presents the definitions of the basic categories of the topic under study, the attention being focused on the dependence of the worldview orientations and the model of behavior of a person, first of all, on his/her financial standing. Solving complex tasks set by the internal development of our society and the international situation puts forward a pressing issue of forming a systematized scientific worldview. Tackling problems of worldview of a society can be facilitated by revision of the concepts of building its scientific and educational spheres. Worldview management should be oriented not towards standard functions and principles of management but towards the formation of conditions for enhancing internal conscious sources of people’s desire to carry out their own unique ideas in practice. The processes of consolidation and solidarity are implemented both in society as a whole and its scientific sphere, in particular. They are manifested in their full in schools of thought.

Keywords: worldview, consolidation and solidarity among the members of society, factors influencing the worldview formation and development, educational and scientific sphere of society, schools of thought.

Bibl.: 27.

Kyzym Mykola O. – Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, Corresponding Member of NAS of Ukraine, Chief research scientist, Research Centre for Industrial Problems of Development of NAS of Ukraine (2 floor 1-a Inzhenernyi Ln., Kharkіv, 61166, Ukraine)
Email: m.kyzym@gmail.com
Doronina Maya S. – Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, Senior Research Fellow, Research Centre for Industrial Problems of Development of NAS of Ukraine (2 floor 1-a Inzhenernyi Ln., Kharkіv, 61166, Ukraine)
Email: doroninamas@gmail.com

List of references in article

Andrushchenko, V. “Svitohliadna navihatsiia osvity: yak vyvchennia filosofii formuie dukhovno spromozhnu osobystist“ [Worldview Navigation of Education: How the Study of Philosophy Forms a Spiritually Able Person]. Ukraina moloda. 21.03.2018. https://umoloda.kyiv.ua/number/3289/188/121660/
Aseyev, A. L. “Bez nauki u Rossii net budushchego“ [Without Science, Russia Has no Future]. EKO, vol. 1, no. 1 (2010): 1-18.
Beketova, S. I., Sadretdinov, D. F., and Gaysin, R. I. “Diagnostika sformirovannosti nauchnogo mirovozzreniya shkolnikov VI-IX klassov v protsesse obucheniya geografii“ [Diagnostics of the Formation of the Scientific Worldview of Students of Grades VI-IX in the Process of Teaching Geography]. Filologiya i kultura, no. 1 (2013): 231-235.
Bolshakov, Ye. V., and Fedotov, Ye. V. “Mirovozzreniye i yego rol v formirovanii moralnogo i pravovogo soznaniya lichnosti“ [Worldview and its Role in the Formation of Moral and Legal Consciousness of the Individual]. Srednerusskiy vestnik obshchestvennykh nauk, no. 2 (2013): 7-10.
Vaytszekker, E., Lovins, E., and Lovins, L. Faktor chetyre. Zatrat - polovina, otdacha - dvoynaya. Novyy doklad Rimskomu klubu [Factor four. The Cost is half, the Return is double. New Report to the Club of Rome]. Moscow: Academia, 2000.
Vatulin, A. I. “Ideologiya i yee mekhanizmy“ [Ideology and its Mechanisms]. In Khrestomatiya k uchebniku po politicheskoy psikhologii. St. Petersburg: Kolo, 2012.
Vernadskiy, V. I. “O nauchnom mirovozzrenii“ [On the Scientific Worldview]. In Na perelome. Filosofskiye diskussii 20-kh godov. Filosofiya i mirovozzreniye, 180-203. Moscow, 1990.
Volovich, V. N. “Rol ekonomicheskogo mirovozzreniya v razvitii chelovecheskogo obshchestva“ [The Role of the Economic Worldview in the Development of Human Society]. Zapiski Gornogo instituta, vol. 163 (2005): 223-226.
Gofman, A. B. “Solidarnost ili pravila, Dyurkgeym ili Khayek? O dvukh formakh sotsialnoy integratsii“ [Solidarity or Rules, Durkheim or Hayek? About Two Forms of Social Integration]. In Sotsiologicheskiy yezhegodnik 2012, 97-167. Moscow: INION RAN; Kafedra obshchey sotsiologii NIU VShE, 2013.
Zhilin, V. I. “K voprosu o mekhanizmakh formirovaniya sinergeticheskogo mirovozzreniya“ [To the Question of the Mechanisms of Formation of a Synergetic Worldview]. Filosofiya i obshchestvo, no. 4 (2011): 87-96.
Zelenkov, A. I. Ustoychivoye razvitiye i sotsialno-ekologicheskiye parametry kachestva zhizni [Sustainable Development and Socio-environmental Parameters of Quality of Life]. Minsk, 2011.
Zelenov, L. A., and Vladimirov, A. A. “Matritsa obshchey teorii mirovozzreniya“ [The Matrix of the General Theory of Worldview]. In Mirovozzrencheskaya paradigma v filosofii: Osnovopolozheniya ontognoseologii. Nizhniy Novgorod: NNGASU, 2018.
Zuyev, K. A., and Krotkov, Ye. A. “Mirovozzreniye, filosofiya, nauka: problema ikh sootnosheniya i vzaimodeystviya“ [Worldview, Philosophy, Science: the Problem of Their Relationship and Interaction]. Gumanitarnyye nauki, no. 3 (2013): 4-10.
Ideologiya i filosofiya solidarizma : materialy nauchnogo seminara [The Ideology and Philosophy of Solidarity: Materials of a Scientific Seminar], issue 9. Moscow: Nauchnyy ekspert, 2010.
Ilin, V. V., and Mashentsev, A. V. Filosofiya v skhemakh i kommentariyakh [Philosophy in Diagrams and Comments]. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2005.
Mirovozzrencheskaya paradigma v filosofii: Osnovopolozheniya ontognoseologii [The Worldview Paradigm in Philosophy: the Foundations of Ontognoseology]. Nizhniy Novgorod: NNGASU, 2018.
Myakinnikov, S. P. “Osnovnyye aspekty arkhitektoniki mirovozzreniya kak sotsialnogo fenomena“ [The Main Aspects of the Architectonics of Worldview as a Social Phenomenon]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya «Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Kulturologiya», vol. 33 (2013): 7-15.
Nadolnyi, I. F. “Svitohliadna paradyhma - teoretychna osnova ekonomichnoi transformatsii suspilstva“ [The Worldview Paradigm is the Theoretical Basis of Economic Transformation of Society]. Biznes-analityka v upravlinni zovnishnyoekonomichnoiu diialnistiu. Kyiv, 2018. 131-133.
Okara, A. N. “Sotsialnaya solidarnost kak osnova novogo «mirostroitelnogo» proekta“ [Social Solidarity as the Basis of a New “Peace-building” Project]. Ideologiya i filosofiya solidarizma, issue 9. Moscow: Nauchnyy ekspert, 2010. 7-42.
“Solidarnost i konflikty v sovremennom obshchestve“ [Solidarity and Conflicts in Modern Society]. XII Kovalevskiye chteniya. St. Petersburg: Skifiya-print, 2018.
Stepin, V. S. “Nauchnoye poznaniye i tsennosti tekhnogennoy tsivilizatsii“ [Scientific Knowledge and Values of Technogenic Civilization]. Voprosy filosofii, no. 10 (1989): 3-18.
“Ukraina 2030: Doktryna zbalansovanoho rozvytku“ [Ukraine 2030: The Doctrine of Balanced Development]. Lviv : Kalvariia, 2017. http://econom.chnu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/E-Book-Doctrine-2030.pdf
Filipenko, A. S. “Narodnaya, solidarnaya ekonomika: kontseptualnyy eskiz“ [People, Solidarity Economy: Conceptual Sketch]. Ekonomika Ukrainy, no. 6 (2016): 19-28.
Tsinnisni oriientyry instytutsionalizatsii ekonomichnoho rozvytku [Values of Institutionalization of Economic Development]. Dnipropetrovsk, 2010.
Shveytser, A. Kultura i etika [Culture and Ethics]. Moscow: Progress, 1973.
Shreyber, V. K. “Nauka. Filosofiya. Mirovozzreniye“ [The Science. Philosophy. Worldview]. In Mirovozzrencheskaya paradigma v filosofii: Osnovopolozheniya ontognoseologii, 149-162. Nizhniy Novgorod: NNGASU, 2018.
Yarmol, L. V. “Spivvidnoshennia poniat svitohliadu ta pohliadiv liudyny: teoretyko-pravovi aspekty“ [The Relation between the Concepts of Worldview and Views of Man: Theoretical and Legal Aspects]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika». Yurydychni nauky, no. 837 (2016): 383-389.

  The Promblems of Economy, 2009-2024 The site and its metadata are licensed under CC-BY-SA. Write to webmaster