Development Safety Culture - Communication Culture as the Basis of Management Process Intellectualization
Prokhorova V. V., Mushnykova S. A.

Prokhorova, Viktoriia V., and Mushnykova, Svitlana A. (2019) “Development Safety Culture - Communication Culture as the Basis of Management Process Intellectualization.” The Problems of Economy 4:142–148.
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2019-4-142-148

Section: Economics and Enterprise Management

UDC 101.8:330.34

Abstract:
The aim of the article is the theoretical justification of the relationship of safety development culture – communication culture as the basis for intellectualization of the management process. It is determined that the main source of any culture including the culture of enterprise management is human activity, which acquires meaning in close relations with society, its habits, foundations, traditions. Moreover, social behavior of a human is not in his/her nature, but is formed by individual society, depending on many spatial and temporal features including those of enterprise activity. The basic elements of culture comprise material and spiritual values that characterize the organization of activities and management of an enterprise including the interaction of its members. It is determined and proved that the communication culture at each particular enterprise is the basis for forming the culture of management of its development safety, built on fundamental principles, namely: spirituality, education and upbringing, with the safety culture and development culture being the constituent elements of the culture of development safety management. Based on this, the term “culture of enterprise development safety” is defined as a set of relevant characteristics, rules, norms, and characteristics of enterprise activity, taking into account the psychological behavior and professional skills of individuals responsible for making managerial decisions, in accordance with their priority and significance. Based on the results of the study, there proposed communication dimensions to rely upon in the management process, namely: adaptation; coordinated management of value or rules; rhetoric; constructivism; social categories and circumstances; or conflict. The choice of the dimension of the communication culture and orientation towards it will provide an opportunity to determine qualitative aspects of the selected culture of management of enterprise development safety and increase the level of intellectualization in managerial decision-making.

Keywords: culture of communication, culture of enterprise development, culture of enterprise safety, culture of enterprise development safety.

Fig.: 3. Bibl.: 9.

Prokhorova Viktoriia V. – Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, Head of the Department, Department of Economics and Management, Educational and Scientific Institute "Ukrainian Engineering and Pedagogical Academy" of V. N. Karazin Kharkov National University (16 Unіversytetska Str., Kharkіv, 61003, Ukraine)
Email: vkprohkorova@gmail.com
Mushnykova Svitlana A. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of Finance, The National Metallurgical Academy of Ukraine (4 Haharіna Ave., Dnіpropetrovsk, 49600, Ukraine)
Email: svetamush@gmail.com

List of references in article

Azhybekova, K. A., Togusakov, O. A., and Brusilovskiy, D. A. “Korrelyativnaya vzaimosvyaz kultury i tsivilizatsii (metodologicheskiye aspekty)“ [The Correlative Relationship of Culture and Civilization (Methodological Aspects)]. Obshchestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kultura, no. 3 (2017): 9-16.
Biehun, V. V. et al. Kultura bezpeky v yadernii enerhetytsi [The Culture of Safety in Nuclear Power]. Kyiv, 2012.
Gudkov, D. B. Teoriya i praktika mezhkulturnoy kommunikatsii [Theory and Practice of Intercultural Communication]. Moscow: Gnozis, 2003.
Kulikova, L. V. Mezhkulturnaya kommunikatsiya: teoreticheskiye i prikladnyye aspekty. Na materiale russkoy i nemetskoy lingvokultur [Intercultural Communication: Theoretical and Applied Aspects. Based on the Material of Russian and German Linguistic Cultures]. Krasnoyarsk: RIO KGPU, 2004.
“Kultura“ [Culture]. Vikipediia - vilna entsyklopediia. http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Muradyan, Ye. S. “Tsennostnyye gruppy kommunitaristov i individualistov v sovremennom ukrainskom obshchestve: sravnitelnyy analiz“ [Value Groups of Communitarian and Individualists in Modern Ukrainian Society: A Comparative Analysis]. In Metodolohiia, teoriia ta praktyka sotsiolohichnoho analizu suchasnoho suspilstva, 481-486, 2008.
[Legal Act of Ukraine] (2007). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0056-08
Sliusarevskyi, N. M. “Kryterii vyiavlennia kulturnykh rozmezhuvan u suchasnomu ukrainskomu suspilstvi“ [Criteria for Identifying Cultural Differences in Contemporary Ukrainian Society]. Metodolohiia, teoriia ta praktyka sotsiolohichnoho analizu suchasnoho suspilstva: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats (2007): 410-415.
Frik, T. B. Osnovy teorii mezhkulturnoy kommunikatsii [Fundamentals of the Theory of Intercultural Communication]. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta, 2013.