Formation of the Economics of Peacebuilding in the System of National Economic Security
Ilyash O. I., Blokhin P. V.

Ilyash, Olha I., and Blokhin, Pavlo V. (2019) “Formation of the Economics of Peacebuilding in the System of National Economic Security.” The Problems of Economy 2:45–52.
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2019-2-45-52

Section: Economics and national economy management

UDC 341.215.2:351.82(477)

Abstract:
The urgency, versatility and complexity of the problem of establishing the economics of peacebuilding in the system of national economic security are a matter of utmost importance for Ukraine, which has become an object of the Russian aggression, and requires a more deep study. The absence in the Ukrainian realities of a relevant study on the problem of the economics of peacebuilding complicates the development of mechanisms for overcoming internal and external threats to the economic security of the country, which necessitates the intensification of scientific research in this area. The article examines the development principles of the economics of peacebuilding, as a tool to overcome the social and economic imbalances in the development of Ukraine, and its impact on ensuring the economic security of the country. An attempt is made to determine the impact of the economics of peacebuilding on the system of economic security of the country in the post-conflict period. It is proved that the economics of peacebuilding in the system of national security is the material basis for the national sovereignty. The results of the study deepen the problem of underdevelopment of economic ties with EU countries. The authors are convinced that the reduction of hybrid threats and risks to the economic security of the country based on the economics of peacebuilding can guarantee the sustainability and stability of the national economy, its ability for self-development and economic progress along with social priorities and interests of the country. At the same time, the achievement of a truce creates new opportunities for the restoration of industrial and infrastructure facilities, attraction of international donors, resumption of economic ties, real support and revitalization of small and medium-sized businesses, formation of a new business model of the national economy. It is concluded that among the national interests of Ukraine in the sphere of economic security the highest priority should be paid to the creation of a competitive, socially oriented economy on the basis of peacebuilding and ensuring a steady increase in the standard of living and welfare of the population.

Keywords: economics of peacebuilding, national economic security, peacebuilding complex, post-conflict period, hybrid threats, socio-economic development, national security.

Fig.: 5. Bibl.: 14.

Ilyash Olha I. – Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Professor, Professor, Department of Economic Cybernetics, National Technical University of Ukraine «Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute» (37 Beresteiskyi Ave., Kyiv, 03056, Ukraine)
Email: oliai@meta.ua
Blokhin Pavlo V. – Postgraduate Student, International University of Finance (37 Peremohy Ave., Kyiv, 03056, Ukraine)
Email: poll7676@gmail.com

List of references in article

Tkach, V. “Ekonomichna bezpeka v umovakh rynkovykh transformatsii“ [Economic security in the conditions of market transformations]. Yevropeiskyi vektor ekonomichnoho rozvytku, no. 1 (2011): 228-234.
Mohammed, A. N. “The Sudan: The cost of the second civil war (1983-1993)“. In Economics of Conflict and Peace. New York: Routledge, 2017.
Kalachova, H. “Tsina viiny. Skilky podatkiv vtratyv biudzhet cherez ATO“ [The price of war. How many taxes have lost the budget through ATO]. Ekonomichna pravda. https://www.epravda.com.ua/publications/2016/08/30/603534/
“Ekonomicheskaya sostavlyayushchaya v strukture natsionalnoy bezopasnosti“ [The economic component in the structure of national security]. https://textbooks.studio/menedjment-antikrizisnoe-upravlenie/ekonomicheskaya-sostavlyayuschaya-strukture-26299.html
“Myrobudivnytstvo“ [World-building]. Vikipediia - vilna entsyklopediia. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9C%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE
“Peacebuilding“. Vikipediia - vilna entsyklopediia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peacebuilding
Genyk, M. “Definitsiya ponyatiya «mezhnatsionalnoye primireniye»“ [The definition of "inter-ethnic reconciliation"]. file:///C:/Users/pavlo.blohin/Dropbox/MUF/graduate%20school/ТЕЗИ/3/library/Genyk%201409.pdf
Taksas, B. “Role of peacebuilding in context of economic security“. https://www.unob.cz/eam/Documents/Archiv/EaM_2_2015/Taksas.pdf
“Rol ekonomichnoi bezpeky v systemi natsionalnoi bezpeky“ [The role of economic security in the national security system]. https://pidruchniki.com/13761025/ekonomika/rol_ekonomichnoyi_bezpeki_sistemi_natsionalnoyi_bezpeki
[Legal Act of Ukraine] (2003). http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/964-15
Vorozhikhin, V. “Ob opredelenii ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti v usloviyakh globalizatsii“ [On the definition of economic security in the context of globalization]. Bezopasnost, no. 3 (2014): 3-7.
Cedric de Coning, Adaptive peacebuilding. https://academic.oup.com/ia/article/94/2/301/4851911
Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy. http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua
“Chorna knyha Kremlia. Viina Rosii proty Ukrainy. Liutyi 2015. Vtraty i zbytky, yaki nese Ukraina vnaslidok tymchasovoi okupatsii Rosiiskoiu Federatsiieiu Krymu ta ahresii, shcho tryvaie v okremykh raionakh Donetskoi i Luhanskoi oblastei“ [The Black Book of the Kremlin. Russia's War Against Ukraine. February 2015. Losses and losses borne by Ukraine as a result of the temporary occupation by the Russian Federation of Crimea and aggression that continues in certain districts of Donetsk and Lugansk regions]. http://mfa.gov.ua/mediafiles/files/misc/2015-02-20/Kremlin_Black_Book_February_2015.pdf