Designing the Process of Ensuring the Strategic Performance of Enterprises
Lavrenenko V. V., Yanhol H. V.

Lavrenenko, Valentyna V., and Yanhol, Hanna V. (2019) “Designing the Process of Ensuring the Strategic Performance of Enterprises.” The Problems of Economy 2:108–118.
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-0712-2019-2-108-118

Section: Economics and Enterprise Management

UDC 338.2

Abstract:
The aim of the article is to develop an algorithm for designing the process of ensuring strategic performance of enterprises based on the principles of complexity theory. For the first time, the concept “strategic performance of an enterprise” is defined. There disclosed the content of the phenomenon of integrating performance measurement systems into the mechanism of strategic performance management reflecting the complex process of ensuring the highest possible level of strategic performance. The process is presented in the form of a complex system characterized by its own properties – control components and stages. The sources of difficulties that can emerge in such integration are identified. The integrated business model of an enterprise as the optimal one for achieving the maximum strategic effectiveness of an enterprise is considered. There proposed an algorithm for the development of an integrated system to ensure effective performance based on the formation and implementation of measuring the level of strategic performance.

Keywords: strategic performance, performance measurement system, business model, complexity theory, process of ensuring strategic performance.

Fig.: 3. Tabl.: 1. Bibl.: 16.

Lavrenenko Valentyna V. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman (54/1 Beresteiskyi Ave., Kyiv, 03057, Ukraine)
Email: vlave@ukr.net
Yanhol Hanna V. – Postgraduate Student, Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman (54/1 Beresteiskyi Ave., Kyiv, 03057, Ukraine)
Email: anna.buglak@gmail.com

List of references in article

Oleksiuk, O. I. “Rezultatyvnist diialnosti pidpryiemstv yak osnova formuvannia yikh investytsiinoi pryvablyvosti“ [Effectiveness of enterprises as a basis for their investment attractiveness]. Investytsii: praktyka ta dosvid, no. 3 (2009): 21-26.
Udovikin, A. V. “Sushchnost i soderzhaniye upravleniya rezultativnostyu deyatelnosti predpriyatiya“ [The essence and content management performance of the enterprise]. Vestnik VGTU. 2011. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/suschnost-i-soderzhanie-upravleniya-rezultativnostyu-deyatelnosti-predpriyatiya
Yanhol, H. V. “Teoretyko-metodychni aspekty upravlinnia stratehichnoiu rezultatyvnistiu pidpryiemstv“ [Theoretical and methodical aspects of management of strategic productivity of enterprises]. Ekonomika pidpryiemstva: teoriia ta praktyka. Kyiv: KNEU, 2012. 91-94.
Bititci, U. S. Managing Business Performance: The Science and the Art. WILEY, 2015.
Brown, S. L., and Eisenhardt, K. M. “The art of continuous change: linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations“. Administrative Science Quarterly, no. 42 (1997): 1-34.
Franco-Santos, M., Lucianetti, L., and Bourne, M. “Contemporary performance measurement systems: a review of their consequences and a framework for research“. Management Accounting Research, no. 23 (2012): 79-119.
Harkness, M., and Bourne, M. “Is complexity a barrier to the practice of performance measurement?“ https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/business/about/seminars-events/2015/February/HARKNESS%20Complexity%20barriers.pdf
Melnyk, S. A., Bititci, U. S., and Platts, K. “Is performance measurement and management fit for the future?“ Management Accounting Research, no. 25 (2014): 173-186.
Okwir, S. et al. “Performance Measurement and Management Systems: A Perspective from Complexity Theory“. International Journal of Management Reviews, no. 20 (2018): 731-754.
Roehrich, J., and Lewis, M. “Procuring complex performance: implications for exchange governance complexity“. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, no. 34 (2014): 221-241.
Smith, M., and Bititci, U. S. “Interplay between performance measurement and management, employee engagement and performance“. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, no. 37 (2017): 1207-1228.
Stacey, R. D. “The science of complexity: an alternative perspective for strategic change processes“. Strategic Management Journal, no. 16 (1995): 477-495.
Nudurupati, S. S. et al. “State of the art literature review on performance measurement“. Computers and Industrial Engineering, no. 60 (2011): 279-290.
Striteska, M. “Key features of strategic performance management systems in manufacturing companies“. Social and Behavioral Sciences, no. 58 (2012): 1103-1110.
Almstrom, P., Andersson, C., and Oberg, A. E. Sustainable and resource efficient business performance measurement systems - The handbook. Molndal, Sweden: Billes Tryckeri, 2017.
“The Six Systems of Organizational Effectiveness“. The Leadership Circle. 2015. https://leadershipcircle.com/the-six-systems-of-organizational-effectiveness/